kevin_standlee: (End Of Block)
In yesterday's mail, I got a very polite apology letter from Metra regarding the "Photographing Trains is Illegal" incident, with a reassurance that the crew in question has been interviewed and corrected. They also sent me a cap with the Metra logo on it, which was nice. I don't know if it would be a good idea for me to wear it while around the system -- say when I go to Chicago in October for a meeting, should I have any spare time -- lest someone complain that I'm pretending to work for them! It is, however, tempting to take my camera with me and, if time permits, go photograph some Metra trains just to see if I get anyone else telling me that train photography is illegal.
kevin_standlee: (Wig Wag)
I just received a phone call from Sharon Austin, Metra's chief communications officer. My letter about the "photos are illegal" conductor was pushed up to her, and she called me to apologize and ask for more information, like could I identify the specific staff member (alas, I couldn't -- no name badge, and I don't remember which hat the man was wearing -- conductor or collector). She said that I did everything right, and that the technical term for what I was doing was "tourist." *smile* She says they'll figure out who the crew was on that train and at the very least remind them of what the rules actually are. According to her, Metra is in the process of re-doing their web site, and that they will have a photo policy that will be easier to find there once the revamp is done. I should also expect to get a written reply. We chatted amiably for about fifteen minutes, and she invited me to look her up the next time I'm in the Chicago area if I have the time.

All in all, I feel much better about the whole thing. This may well be a learning experience for the crew member in question. Assuming he's never done anything like this before, I'm not looking to get the guy fired. I just don't want him or his buddies hassling people who aren't doing anything wrong.
kevin_standlee: (End Of Block)
I didn't complain to Metra about our run-in with the "photography is illegal" conductor in Chicago immediately, because Metra does not appear to have any way of sending them comments or questions electronically, so I waited until I was back in my office in California to compose a paper letter, which I sent them a couple of days ago. At the same time, I sent short letters to the major Chicago newspapers (through their web sites) and also to the editor of Trains magazine. About the same time, I was reading in the September 2009 issue of Trains about how to behave if an authority figure hassles you about rail photography. (It's not illegal, despite what a number of uninformed people seem to have assumed.) Thanks to Trains' "Potomac Pundit," I'm now in contact with someone who may know the right people to talk to directly at Metra. I hope so, and I hope that I hear that the conductor in question (I could identify the train number, date, and station, so it should not be impossible to find out who it was) is corrected and Metra sorts out this behavior, designed to terrorize their customers.
kevin_standlee: (End Of Block)
This is the video that the Metra Electric conductor insisted was "against the law" to have shot. ("But we won't make you delete it this time.") If the embedding below doesn't work, try the direct link.



Not that I would have wanted to have been party to destroying evidence, because I know that's a crime. If anyone can find actual evidence of a US federal, Illinois state, or Chicago city law being broken, let me know. Note: Citing policies against video or pictures in other jurisdictions, which several people have done, isn't the same thing at all. Besides, if Metra has a policy against allowing photography, they've done a really good job of concealing it. Maybe it's a Secret Law Passed By The President -- something that a police officer has been said to have said while hassling another railfan photographer in the Chicago area a while ago according to something I recall reading in Trains magazine.

Update, 10:30: Based on the discussion in the comments below, I point y'all at Metra's web site, within which I can find no mention of photography at all. Nor can I find a way to contact them by e-mail, which means I probably won't be contacting them until I get back to California next week and have time to compose a paper letter.
kevin_standlee: (Pointless Arrow)
As we rolled into Albuquerque station, I fished for a public wireless internet signal. There may have been one from the Alvarado Transportation Center (New Mexico Rail Runner commuter trains and buses) adjacent to the Amtrak/Greyhound station, but it wasn't strong enough to hold up, and I wasn't going to go hauling my computer around during our 45-minutes servicing and inspection stop.

Once Again, I am a Potential Terrorist )

Wild Weather and Fantastic Scenery )

About 'Foamers' )

Hey, kids, this isn't a playground! )

Returning to our room around 9 PM, Lisa and I took stock of the schedule for the next day. With breakfast seating running from only 5 to 5:30 due to the anticipated early arrival at Los Angeles, we decided to skip breakfast and sleep an extra hour. Nevertheless, it was important to get to bed early, so we did so as best we could.
kevin_standlee: (Kevin and Lisa)
As we stood at the Metra Electric 55/56/57 St Station waiting for our train back downtown from the museum to arrive, Lisa got out her camera. She took pictures of the train as it approached the platform. We went and sat down, and the conductor came to collect our tickets. He said, "I saw that you were taking pictures as we came in. That's against the law."

Kevin Wishes He Could Make a Federal Case of It )

It boils my blood to let these "jobsworths" get away with petty stuff like this. I do very much intend to follow up with Metra about this outrage. Lisa is still shaky. I also intend to write to Trains magazine – the most widely-read American railroading magazine – and for good measure, Rail magazine in the UK, where I picked up the "jobsworth" term because the same thing has been happening there as well.

If there is such a law/rule/policy, Metra should be publicizing it. But I've also heard that police sometime claim that it's a "secret law." Secret Law is a fundamental violation of American Law, and it is a step toward a dictatorship in the name of "security."

Ironically, the Amtrak porter who took us to our sleeping car at Union Station told us of a group traveling on our train this evening that had been taking pictures of it, and he couldn't understand the fascination. Amtrak has a policy about photography, albeit a stupid one that clearly isn't meant to be enforced – "Only ticketed passengers may photograph trains." They don't claim that there's a Secret Law banning rail photography. Sheesh.

Addendum, 5 Aug 00:05: Lisa had me do a Google Image search and points out that the search "Metra Electic Chicago" returns more than 79,000 images, many of which are very similar to what she was shooting. How, pray tell, will our photos damage "security?"

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 3 4 56 7
89 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 1718 19 20 21
222324 25 26 27 28
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 29th, 2025 09:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »